What is 360 Degree Feedback? How it’s Used and Why Should You Use It

A group around a table celebrating after being given 360 degree feedback.

Table of Contents

What is 360 Degree Feedback? You may be asking yourself this question. 360-degree feedback, also known as multi-rater feedback, is a system in which anonymous feedback is gathered about a member of staff from various people they have working relationships with. This usually includes their managers, peers, and direct reports among others – hence the name “360 degrees”. It’s designed so that a range of people can share their opinion to providing a well-rounded view of the individual.

360-degree feedback surveys are an effective way to measure strengths and weaknesses, which is why managers within organizations use this system. The 360-degree feedback survey automatically tabulates the results, presenting them in a format that helps the employee create their development plan while preserving anonymity by combining individual responses with those of others who share similar rating categories (e.g., peers or direct reports).

360-degree Feedback is useful for everyone, not just managers. It’s important that non-managers are able to use this development tool as well in order to understand what areas they should focus on if they want a promotion and become leaders themselves someday.

Definition of 360 Degree Feedback

360-degree feedback is a process that helps each employee receive performance information from his or her supervisor and peers. It typically consists of four to eight people who give their opinion on the individual’s strengths, weaknesses, the best skillset for future development, and whether they would recommend hiring them. Most tools also have an option for self-assessment where employees can input what it feels like when receiving criticism from others in order to improve themselves with constructive criticism rather than reacting defensively out of hurt feelings later down the line.

The feedback provided insight into the skills and behaviors desired in the organization to accomplish its mission, vision, and goals. The tone of voice should be formal so that it is clear what qualities are wanted for employees. People who provide feedback usually know this person well because they interact with them often on a daily basis as customers or coworkers at work; thus making their opinion matter more than others.

How is 360 Degree Feedback Applied

1. As an employee developmental tool

With 360 feedback, employees get a chance to receive anonymous positive and constructive criticism from their coworkers in order to develop themselves. Feedback recipients can gain insight into how others perceive them as well as adjust behaviors that will enable them to excel at work.

The 360 evaluation system helps identify strengths and weaknesses in an individual’s workplace behavior by soliciting anonymous input on the person’s abilities as a worker, team player, manager/leader of others (if applicable), decision-maker among peers (again if appropriate) with regard to accomplishing their goals—both business objectives writ large but also smaller tasks such as meeting deadlines or completing assignments.

2. As a performance appraisal tool

When you use a 360 feedback process for Performance Appraisal, the output tone of voice should be formal. This is because it’s difficult to create an atmosphere of trust when using 360 evaluations to measure performance and focus on competencies more than basic skills or job requirements. These things are best addressed by employees with their managers in annual reviews and appraisals where they can discuss them openly without feeling judged against peers who may not have as strong performances as theirs.

Why Use 360 Degree Feedback

The 360-degree feedback is a process designed to help an individual understand their strengths and weaknesses by taking into account the perspectives of others. The purpose of this feedback, as opposed to one person’s opinion or judgment on another, lies in its ability for many people with different backgrounds and experience levels to see things from outside your point of view. These insights can be used not only when it comes time to review performance but also throughout professional development initiatives.

Advantages of 360 Degree Feedback

Jack Zenger, a highly-regarded global expert on organizational behavior, has come to recognize the value of 360-degree feedback as the central part of leadership development programs. It’s practical for getting large groups or leaders in an organization comfortable with receiving feedback from direct reports, peers, and other groups such as suppliers and customers two levels below them in the organization. The more they see how much benefit others can find through this process; many become interested in adding these types of raters to their own list because it’s so beneficial when done properly.

Zenger urges all companies to make use of the 360-degree feedback process. He reminds them about its effectiveness and how it can help with their leadership development efforts, should they not currently be using it.

Better Feedback

360-degree feedback can be a great way for managers to get input from their employees and coworkers, as it is well-rounded. It also frees up time that the manager would otherwise have spent providing feedback on an employee’s work. In this process, people are given opinions of themselves by the people they interact with every day: peers in different departments within the company; reporting staff such as supervisors or lead workers at various levels of hierarchy, and even co-workers outside one’s department! Coworker perception plays a large role in how others perceive your work. 360-degree Feedback helps you understand these perceptions better than ever before so that you know where there might be room for improvement

Improved Team Development

Teams are better for it. Multi-rater feedback helps team members learn to work more effectively together, and they know more about how each member is doing than their manager does! A well-planned process can improve communication while also strengthening the bond between colleagues on a team as you share in the knowledge that will be provided input over one another’s performance.

Development of the Employee and Company

360-degree feedback is one of the best methods for understanding personal and organizational developmental needs in your organization. You may discover what keeps employees from working successfully together and how your organization’s policies, procedures, and approaches affect employee success.

This can be especially helpful when you’re looking to put someone on a performance development plan or find out why they left an office position since it will also inform management about any steps that need to be taken so future turnover doesn’t happen again. In many organizations that use 360-degree feedback.

Employees Can Manage their Career Development

The goal of the organization should be to provide an environment where employees are encouraged and supported in their growth needs. The responsibility falls on both employers and employees, but organizations need to do more than just offer a supportive workspace. Employers have many other responsibilities like pay raises or promotions for example that they must fulfill before creating such an atmosphere will even make sense. Although it may not seem as helpful at first glance, multi-rater feedback provides excellent insight into what individuals need so they can grow successfully within their job role(s) without any outside assistance from the company or its leaders; this type of information is vital when considering how best to get ahead in one’s career.

Disadvantages of 360 Degree Feedback

For every positive point made about 360-degree feedback systems, detractors can offer their own downside. One such problem is the possibility that there could be a whistleblower in your company who wants to ruin morale and make an example out of you for his or her friends on Facebook looking at this page right now. The solution? Implementing anonymous surveys would eliminate any bias from people wanting revenge – just remember not to ask questions like “Who do you think should clean up after everyone?” as it might reveal too much information when designing the survey instrument.

Bad Design Process

When it comes to implementing 360-degree feedback, the most important thing is a cross-section of your employees. Some people will have more experience with this process than others and should take on leadership roles in facilitating discussions or decision-making processes within their departments. It’s easy for HR directors or senior leaders who learned about the process at seminars and books to implement these changes without input from everyone involved but that can lead to problems down the line as they may not be aware of all implications surrounding such an assessment tool.

Too High Expectations

360-degree feedback is not the same as a performance management system. It’s just one input from which to get constructive criticism and develop oneself in an organization. You should make sure that you have enough of these inputs before implementing this type of program since it can be difficult if you only use 360-degree reviews on your own without any other types of meetings or discussions about improving your skillsets with people who know how things work around here first hand.

Too Little Information

The 360 feedback process is a recent development in the workplace, and it’s been met with mixed reviews. While some people think that this anonymous method of giving constructive criticism can be very helpful for employees to grow their skills, others are not so keen on these one-way conversations because they lack an opportunity to clarify unclear comments or provide more information about ratings. However, there may still be hope yet. Companies such as Xerox have found success by implementing coaches who help evaluatees understand what was said during the conversation and offer advice on how to move forward after receiving negative feedback.

Focusing on Negatives and Criticisms

Great managers focus on employee strengths, not their weaknesses. The authors of “First Break All the Rules” say that people don’t change much and it’s a waste to put in what was left out; try to draw out what is already there instead for best success with 360 feedback.

Inexperience of Raters

Employees who receive feedback are often inadequately trained, and this can lead to ratings that don’t reflect performance. There is a risk of raters inflating or deflating the rating based on their opinion of an employee’s ability in order to either make them look good or bad respectively. This leaves open avenues for people within organizations from getting together and artificially inflate everyone’s scores as well — which needs checks-and-balances too.

Read More JobSpring Articles

If you want to learn about leadership and management tips, human resources, productivity tools, and general topics on jobs and careers, you can read more at JobSpring. It is a job board that offers jobs from multinational companies used by aspiring employees all over the world.

Social Media Manager vs. Community Manager: What’s the Difference?

What is the difference between a social media manager and community manager? This has become an increasingly popular question as…

What is the Difference Between a Program Manager and a Project Manager?

How Program Managers and Project Managers Compare It can be difficult to differentiate between a program manager and a project…

What Does a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Do? Overview of the CFO's Responsibilities

Working in organizations or companies, everyone has their job roles from regular employees officers, manager, vice presidents, and then the…